From the Republic: Dealing with sport, football in particular, has its positive sides. For example, I could turn to the Minister Maroni about his directive on transfers Supporters of ignoring other, more dramatic, travel on the Channel of Sicily. I could but I can not. Only two points. It 's very strange' attitude of many members of the League. It is proposed as the most avid defenders of the values \u200b\u200bof 'Christian West and just some bishop or some priest said something that did not send him back to brutally fuck the sea (Milan is a way to say it should be understood as the Sweep' ocean, and in greek, would be part of the gathering). Then (first rule: deny, however, or at least question) is pretty atrocious their arithmetic. The 5 in 73 say they were alive, 14 dead recovered (from memory). 19 And they, where are the other 54? As if the sea were an ATM, a safe, a little 'and asks for a receipt. But we know that the accounts should be returned (to their home too, so they learn). But here it comes to football, other travel expenses. I was surprised the favor with which decisions of Maroni have been successful, apart from the world of ultras (already poisoned by the judgment-Spaccarotella) and Zamparini, who went down to the usual flat talking about fascism and Maroni obviously had a good game in respond with a good book to read. In my Maroni also would not hurt to read a good book, if only then should find someone who explains what he read (see '94, Biondi decree) and you would do later. In other words, to go to the stadium away from 'the beginning of 2010 will be indispensable The "paper fan." Indispensable in Italy, because all 'do not know what is foreign and that in itself could give rise to some doubt. He had not even thought of Thatcher, so to speak. The minister, and you may believe, has heralded some interesting data on violence in decline: fewer injuries among the fans, between the forces of 'order, fewer accidents. But it is normal, given the limits that already exist for postings. Prohibit the figures calerebbero yet, but this paradox evokes Tacitus ("made a desert el 'called peace") and not good. Still, the minister (and someone who 's predecessor) should be acknowledged,' mitigating clubs rather inert (a few exceptions) before the problem supporters' violent or uncooperative, often willing to unload on the shoulders of the state. Sometimes I dream of going on a joint message oalla N share (Maroni-Galliani) whose juice is: statevene home, subscribe to pay-tv that you want and amen. Stay at home can be a choice or an obligation. Some cases penny. A: I am a Chinese tourist (or Mexican) who was visiting Rome. Can I buy a ticket for the derby? No. B: I am a Sardinian living in Milan. Can I buy a ticket for Juventus-Cagliari? No, the sale is often reserved for those who live in the province in which you play. C: I am an honest family man, I speak better than Milan Bossi and his son, for I have two children, I can take the derby? No, because often you can not buy more than one ticket per person. And then they keep saying that we must bring families to the stadium. Here, in three cases, I think I see a limitation on individual freedom. In other words, pure and comfortable, let's divide the fans into good and bad. The villains identified, in theory, are already subject to Daspi, then registered and controlled. But what need is there 'is to record the good ones? This is the point. While the touts are still doing good business and if they do not care of the individual ticket, while not bad, until proven otherwise, but a little 'rough move anyway, then we'll see, I would like someone to explain to me why a national criminal record, no specific precedents, is not free to travel in his country and go to the stadium and just paying a ticket, how do the rest of the world. If he breaks the law, we think the police. Treat the good from bad, so we know they are good, is not fascism, it's pretty dumb enough management of power. He buries it, without a flower, the Sunday of the good people who use them only the knives in a restaurant before or after the game. It affects the rights of a majority to limit the damage of a 'small minority. If this is normal, tell you. I do not think so. If freedom of movement passes through a catalog (this is no more, no less), It seems to me a condition of freedom. C 'is for a constitutional case that has something to say? - Gianni Mura
0 comments:
Post a Comment