From The Time: Morning of an ordinary day, a Sunday two years ago. In a service station in Arezzo fans of Lazio and Juventus meet by chance. A hint of a scuffle and two patrols of the road involved, then a shot in the air scares the boys arguing. The tires screeching on the asphalt, is a general stampede. Suddenly another shot rings out in the air, a shot at first denied but which many witnesses have heard. 9:15 am to 11 November 2007, died as Gabriele Sandri, the neck pierced by a bullet exploded from the order of the assistant police Beretta Luigi Spaccarotella. It took two years and a long, tortured trial court to arrive at a truth that perhaps the truth is not, in a strongly contested by the ruling family of cages, ready to challenge the decision on appeal. That cop, Spaccarotella Louis, was sentenced to six years imprisonment for manslaughter, the prosecutor, asking for 14 for murder. Yesterday I published the reasons. And all around the axle to a gradient legal so slight as to seem inconsistent, yet so profound as to claim the life of a boy. It's possible intent, which qualifies the state of mind who committed the crime: run chase with a gun in his hand, aiming to pave the weapon with both arms outstretched, shoot towards the Renault Megane of those guys who ran dall'autogrill Arezzo Badia al Pino. Really wanted to kill the cop? He wanted to hit Gabriele Sandri? Requests that the Court of Assizes of Arezzo has dissolved, giving confidence to Spaccarotella: "Never, never could accept that the bullet ended up hitting someone or even kill the occupants," the judges shall record in the 143 pages of the measure. But they are questions, however, that make no sense and who depart from an incorrect assumption, namely that Spaccarotella would hit the tires of the car. Neglecting the only detail of importance in this whole damn story from that perspective, the tires of the Megane were not visible. The bullet went through it so the highway, but the view was covered in that portion of the hedge. Irrelevant diversion that the nose cone suffered due to the impact with the wire, which deflected the shot, it's true, but only horizontally. If anything, what matters is the height of the shot, what matters is that the same Spaccarotella, heard by the prosecutor after the facts, never spoke of wanting to aim for the tires, or rather has continued to defend the thesis of accidental blow to party Having accidentally stumbled in the race, "stated that it considered that if I shot with the intention of hitting the car that position, but I could hit any of the cars at that hour travel along roadways, "his statement in the minutes. Five witnesses, however, dismantle the view of the incident, said they saw him point the gun, and even the judges deny this possibility: he wanted to shoot at the wheels, this thesis, but wrong is intended, the bullet was deflected by the network, Gabriele Sandri died. Murder because, in short, no matter if Spaccarotella has never admitted any of this: the court holds that "the blow was directed, undirected, mind you, but directed toward one side of the car be placed no more than approximately half of its height. " The evidence to the contrary, however, are many. The witnesses first, that crystallize the image of the cop who takes aim, the view, reconstructed by experts, according to which from that point of focus on the bottom of the Megane was covered. So the question is starting to be wrong: that is, if you really wanted to kill the agent. The right question is: "What was intended Spaccarotella?" From that position he could only aim for the cockpit, the answer, though certainly not wanted to kill himself Gabriele Sandri, who did not even know. So here is the notion of intentional possible: the doctrine and also to the case, the last sentence of the Supreme Court of the 44,712 in December 2008 that the magistrates in Arezzo neglect, is the acceptance of the risk of procuring an event-crime, the decision to do whatever the cost, namely risk prediction and its consequences. What risk could then lead, not just a cop with a minimum of experience but in the eyes of anyone, the decision to shoot across the highway against the cockpit of a speeding car, whatever the cost? Gabriele Sandri, guilty of being a fan and you are in the wrong place at the wrong time, he discovered on his skin.
0 comments:
Post a Comment